Comparative Historical Sociology and the State: Problems of Method
نویسنده
چکیده
In this article, I take issue with the conceptual apparatus and methodological prescriptions of comparative historical sociology. I will suggest that its problematic features are longstanding. In consequence, a dominant tendency of the field – that of returning to the ‘classics’ as a means of overcoming deficiencies found in more recent contributions – has the effect of reinforcing what is problematic. From its inception, for example, the main concern of classical historical sociology, as Shmuel Eisenstadt suggests, was to understand ‘the peculiar “qualitative” and “descriptive” characteristics of pre-modern European and non-European societies in relation to, and especially in contrast with, modern (initially European) societies’ (1974: 225). Thus, for Max Weber, the starting point of what he regarded as ‘European exceptionalism’ led him to examine the specific circumstances associated with Europe, as well as social and economic processes in other parts of the world in terms of their differences from Europe and as obstacles to the development of capitalist modernity in other parts of the world. I have argued elsewhere that the situation is not substantially different in the case of Karl Marx and later Marxist approaches (Bhambra, 2011). In both Weber and Marx, there was little to no consideration of how the already existing historical connections between parts of the world might be implicated in developments that otherwise were perceived as endogenous and independent processes originating in Europe (though, of course, they differed in their accounts of the mechanisms involved). Insofar as each believed modernity to have world historical significance, the global world prior to the diffusion of modernity was argued to have no significance in determining its subsequent form.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Development Plans in Iran and South Korea during Last Four Decades with Emphasis on Economic and Political Development
This study aims to a comparative study of development plans of Iran and South Korea over the past four decades with an emphasis on economic and political development using comparative historical; research method. Theoretical framework is derived from Amartya Sen, Shils and Adrian Leftwich theories. Results of this study depict that under development approach of South Korea, priority has been co...
متن کاملSociological Approaches to International Relations
1. Sociology's Relevance to International Relations 2. Historical Origins of Sociological Thought 3. Historical Sociology 4. The Historical Sociology of the State and International Relations 5. Principles of Historical Sociology 6. Problems with Historical Sociology 7. Sociology of Globalization 8. Global Versus Historical Sociology? 9. The Future Sociological Agenda in International Relations ...
متن کاملHistorical and Philosophical Development of Development Sociology
Growing number of scholars in sociology has come to terms that sociology, like everything else, is a product of particular historical conditions. As there is sociology of everything. You can turn on your sociological eye no matter where you are or what you are doing, taking for example, the latent reasoning usually adopted by sociologist in viewing issues as against some others who ignorantly e...
متن کاملComparative Analysis of the Kurdish Problem in Turkey and the Issue of Chinese in Malaysia within the Context of Nation-State and Ethnic Differences: Advantages and Disadvantages in terms of Turkey
In this study, the ethnic problems which are one of the most significant and perhaps the primary structural difficulties and problems of the nation-state and possible solutions will be suggested. Even if it starts with the general information, the focus of this study would be the subject matter which is known as the Southeastern Problem in Turkey yet it has started to be mentioned as the Kurdis...
متن کامل